A dozen former FBI agents filed a federal lawsuit against Director Kash Patel and the DOJ, claiming they were unlawfully fired for kneeling during 2020 civil unrest to prevent violence rather than show solidarity with leftist protesters.
Story Snapshot
- Twelve former FBI agents sued Patel and DOJ for wrongful termination over 2020 kneeling incident
- Agents claim they knelt tactically to de-escalate mob confrontation, not in political protest
- Lawsuit alleges political retaliation against agents perceived as “not affiliated with President Trump”
- Fired agents include counterterrorism specialists and veterans with over 15 years experience
Agents Claim Tactical Decision, Not Political Statement
The former FBI agents maintain their June 4, 2020 actions were purely tactical responses to a dangerous crowd situation. According to the lawsuit filed in Washington’s federal court, agents faced a hostile mob containing both confrontational individuals and families with children.
The agents closest to the crowd knelt first to prevent civilians from making physical contact or attempting to gain control of their weapons and equipment.
Fired FBI agents file lawsuit against FBI director Kash Patel and DOJ, alleging unlawful retaliation https://t.co/iGxpsC863I
— CBSColorado (@CBSNewsColorado) December 9, 2025
Lack of Proper Equipment Forced Improvised Response
The lawsuit reveals significant operational failures that left agents unprepared for crowd control duties. Despite being deployed to show visible law enforcement presence with marked FBI vests and firearms, the agents lacked essential riot control equipment including shields, gas masks, helmets, and tactical gear.
This equipment shortage forced agents to improvise de-escalation tactics when confronted with the volatile situation on Washington’s streets.
High-Ranking Officials Targeted in Purge
The terminations reached deep into FBI leadership ranks, affecting experienced counterterrorism specialists and agents with over 15 years of criminal investigation experience.
Jane Doe 5, identified as a Deputy Assistant Director overseeing counterintelligence at FBI Headquarters, was specifically informed she was being removed at Patel’s direction because of her June 4, 2020 kneeling.
This suggests the personnel actions targeted senior officials capable of influencing agency operations and policy.
Pattern of Litigation Against Patel’s Leadership
This lawsuit represents the latest challenge to Patel’s management of the FBI, with multiple former officials alleging political retaliation. Former FBI Acting Director Brian Driscoll previously filed a federal civil lawsuit challenging his termination, while another group of agents under Capitol riot investigation scrutiny have also sued.
The agents’ attorney, Mary Dohrmann, warned that “internal FBI processes are being subverted in a way that makes us all less safe.”
Constitutional Questions About Agency Loyalty
The case raises fundamental questions about whether law enforcement agencies should prioritize constitutional duties over political loyalty. The lawsuit cites Patel’s book “Government Gangsters,” where he advocated removing government employees who “won’t undermine the president’s agenda.”
This creates tension between professional law enforcement standards and political expectations, particularly when agents face split-second decisions during civil unrest situations requiring tactical judgment rather than ideological considerations.
