The Department of War suspended Army Colonel Scott Stephens after publicly stating that conservative activist Charlie Kirk “deserved to be assassinated” following Kirk’s tragic death at Utah Valley University.
Story Overview
- Colonel Stephens made inflammatory social media comments celebrating Kirk’s assassination.
- Department of War under Secretary Pete Hegseth swiftly suspended the officer.
- Military leadership reaffirmed zero tolerance for celebrating political violence.
- Incident highlights dangerous erosion of military professionalism and discipline.
Military Officer Celebrates Political Assassination
Colonel Scott Stephens crossed every line of military professionalism when he took to social media to justify the assassination of Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA. Stephens suggested Kirk’s conservative rhetoric made his violent death unsurprising and deserved. The comments came shortly after graphic footage of Kirk’s shooting circulated online, adding insult to an already devastating tragedy for Kirk’s wife, Erika, and their two children.
The timing and callousness of Stephens’s remarks reveal a shocking lack of judgment for someone entrusted with military leadership. His comments effectively endorsed political assassination as acceptable when directed at conservatives whose views he opposed. This represents exactly the kind of partisan hatred that has no place in America’s armed forces.
Decommission and release him // Department of War Suspends Army Colonel Scott Stephens for Saying Charlie Kirk Deserved to be Assassinated | The Gateway Pundit | by Cristina Laila https://t.co/dXeYA8zQsb
— Musicgirl77 (@musicgirl77) September 15, 2025
Department of War Takes Swift Action
Secretary Pete Hegseth’s Department of War moved quickly to suspend Stephens, demonstrating the kind of decisive leadership we expect from Trump’s administration. The department issued clear statements reaffirming its zero-tolerance policy for military personnel expressing approval of political violence. Spokesperson Sean Parnell confirmed the agency is monitoring social media activity of other service members for similar misconduct.
This rapid response stands in stark contrast to the previous administration’s tendency to excuse or downplay leftist extremism while targeting conservatives. The military’s swift action sends an important message that celebrating the murder of American citizens based on their political beliefs will not be tolerated under any circumstances.
Broader Pattern of Anti-Conservative Bias
Stephens’ disgusting comments reflect a deeper problem of political radicalization that infected our institutions during the Biden years. The idea that a sitting Army Colonel would publicly celebrate the assassination of a conservative activist reveals how far leftist ideology had penetrated military ranks. Kirk’s only “crime” was advocating for traditional American values and constitutional principles through his work with Turning Point USA.
The incident raises serious questions about how many other military personnel harbor similar extremist views against conservatives. While mainstream media has largely ignored this story, the silence speaks volumes about their complicity in normalizing violence against the right. When military officers feel comfortable celebrating political assassinations, we’re witnessing the complete breakdown of institutional neutrality that once defined our armed forces.
Military Discipline Under New Leadership
The Department of War’s handling of this case underscores the importance of having strong conservative leadership that cleans house in our military institutions. Secretary Hegseth’s zero-tolerance approach to political extremism represents a welcome return to military professionalism after years of woke indoctrination. The department is now tracking similar cases and making clear that service members who celebrate violence against Americans will face consequences.
This case should serve as a warning to other military personnel who might consider using their positions to advance partisan political agendas. The Uniform Code of Military Justice exists precisely to prevent this kind of misconduct, and the current administration appears committed to enforcing it fairly. Military officers serve all Americans, not just those who share their political views.
