BUSTED: Cops Turn Spy Tool Into Stalker Machine

Red Busted stamp on white background — Photo: Shutterstock

Five Indianapolis police officers now face criminal charges for turning a crime-fighting tool into a personal search engine.

Story Snapshot

Prosecutors charged five named officers after an internal audit flagged misuse.
Counts include official misconduct, fraud, and one stalking charge tied to Flock queries.
One officer allegedly ran his ex-wife’s plate more than 950 times in six months.
The department suspended four officers, moved to fire them, and one resigned.

Charges Tied To Specific Officers And Repeated Abuse

Marion County prosecutors charged Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department officers Michael Rogers, Jonathan Schultz, Cassandra Crawley, Matthew Binford, and former officer Abigail Cramer with crimes linked to misuse of Flock license plate readers. The charges are not minor.

Reports show Schultz faces more than two dozen counts, including stalking, while Cramer and Crawley face multiple felony misconduct and misdemeanor fraud counts. Rogers and Binford also face paired felony and misdemeanor counts. These are not policy write-ups; these are criminal cases.

Prosecutors and court summaries outline a pattern, not a one-off lapse. One affidavit summary says Binford queried his ex-wife’s vehicle more than 950 times in six months.

Coverage also says Schultz allegedly ran searches to track his ex-wife and other women he met, which led to the stalking count. The scope makes intent hard to ignore.

Repeated searches of people tied by personal relationships fit classic red flags for misuse, and they show how easily these systems can be abused when access is too easy.

How The Misuse Was Found And What The Department Did

The department says it found “irregular usage” through internal audits, which triggered a criminal referral to county prosecutors. Leaders did not wait for a trial to act inside the agency. The department suspended four officers and recommended termination; one resigned. The department also tightened rules.

Officers must now link every search to a case or incident number and a crime code, and daily audits are part of the fix. This is the right order of operations: detect, document, refer, discipline, and reform.

BREAKING: Five Indianapolis police officers are being criminally charged for misusing Flock cameras.

One of the officers has already resigned, while the other four have been suspended and recommended for termination.https://t.co/Ax6Dy6SHnw

— FOX59 News (@FOX59) September 23, 2026

The audit-first discovery matches a nationwide pattern. Misuse often surfaces only when logs are checked, or a spike in queries looks odd. Watchdog groups have long warned that license plate reader systems demand strict access controls and steady audits.

When those controls are thin, personal lookups become tempting and hard to catch in real time. Indianapolis’ experience follows that script, which is why the audit discipline now matters as much as the charges.

What The Case Says About Power And Restraint

Americans often say tools do not commit abuse; people do. That viewpoint fits here. License plate readers can help catch stolen cars and violent felons, and agencies point to real arrests made with them. But power without guardrails invites harm.

Using a police database to monitor an ex or a date is not policing; it is a breach of the public trust. Calling that conduct “official misconduct” and “fraud” fits the law.

Strong policy turns temptation into risk. Three reforms draw the line bright and bold. First, force every query to carry a case number tied to a real offense. Second, log supervisor checks on unusual activity by user, time, and target.

Third, publish quarterly audit summaries so the public can see trends without exposing private data. Indianapolis has started down this road with daily audits and tighter linking rules. That should be the floor, not the ceiling.

Broader Stakes: Keep The Tool, Fix The Access

License plate readers are not going away. Cities face car theft, drug trafficking, and abductions. These cameras can help when used right. The national record now also shows dozens of officers accused or charged for personal lookups, romantic stalking, or non-law uses.

That is the tradeoff on display: speed and reach for police, offset by abuse risk when oversight lags. The Indianapolis case is a warning label. The answer is measured control, not reflex bans.

These are charges, not convictions, and each officer will have a day in court. The public interest now is twin-track: let the cases run, and lock in auditing and access standards that stop the next breach before it starts.

If the city proves that policy plus logs plus discipline can police the police, trust can be rebuilt on solid ground. If not, the tool will pay the price for the user’s choices—and that would be a loss for safety and liberty alike.